Bomberman for GCG-700
Bomberman for GCG-700
Small screenshot of Bomberman on SHARP MZ-700 adapted for the GCG-700 board with the ZX-Spectrum graphics:
I will put the game online next Saturday
I will put the game online next Saturday
Re: Bomberman for GCG-700
Bomberman for Sharp MZ-700 (original) or Sharp MZ-800 (with graphics coming from ZX Spectrum 48) or Sharp MZ-700 with GCG-700 (with graphics coming from ZX Spectrum 48 too).
I did only one program with a selection at launch: Press 0, 1 or 2
The game :
I did only one program with a selection at launch: Press 0, 1 or 2
The game :
Re: Bomberman for GCG-700
Very nice!
Re: Bomberman for GCG-700
Rednow modified the "EmuZ-700" (Common Source Code Project) emulator.
The DCG-700 (GCG) emulation is supported too.
Kind Regards,
Anna Wu
The DCG-700 (GCG) emulation is supported too.
Kind Regards,
Anna Wu
- Attachments
-
- mz700dcg.7z
- (145.6 KiB) Downloaded 389 times
Re: Bomberman for GCG-700
Please, that's not the correct way to just post a binary. Could you indicate where I can find the source so I could add your contribution here ?
Re: Bomberman for GCG-700
I like you Anna, you are straight to the point
Re: Bomberman for GCG-700
I don't understand the translation "Why do you say here ... Properly implemented will not be incorporated in the future".
As a fact, EmuZ-700 license is: GNU General Public License v2.0, which implies source disclosure especially when there is a modification - official or not.
Because I did one, I added the necessary source for MZ-700/800/1500 on the Github to comply with the source disclosure (and because I have nothing to hide anyway).
I guess you're probably not rednow-san since I see no indication you're the contributor.
A binary can easily contain malicious code so I won't run such a binary lightly.
As a fact, EmuZ-700 license is: GNU General Public License v2.0, which implies source disclosure especially when there is a modification - official or not.
Because I did one, I added the necessary source for MZ-700/800/1500 on the Github to comply with the source disclosure (and because I have nothing to hide anyway).
I guess you're probably not rednow-san since I see no indication you're the contributor.
A binary can easily contain malicious code so I won't run such a binary lightly.